March 16, 2021

Facts About Lead in Balsamic Vinegar

Liz is holding an official Balsamic Vinegar tasting glass from the Consorzio in Modena which she uses to assess and ultimately approve vinegar.

California customers contact us about lead content in balsamic vinegar from time to time, so I thought it would be helpful to summarize key facts regarding this topic. 

The Source of Lead in Vinegar

The balsamic vinegar we import is purchased from a top producer in Modena with whom we work directly. Balsamic vinegar, red wine vinegar, indeed grapes, and other agricultural products can often contain minute amounts of lead, a naturally occurring element found in small amounts in the earth's crust. Lead exposure is a serious concern as toxicity can result. What we know is that lead is not added anywhere in the production of vinegar, nor is it present in any production or storage equipment. Any minute traces of this basic element are naturally occurring and no honest seller of this product can make claims that they have reduced lead or a completely lead-free product.

How much? How do we know?

Because it is not possible to claim vinegar is lead-free, our producer provides chemical analysis of their product to us on a routine basis or on demand, and we have also sampled and tested the balsamic vinegar we sell using a 3rd party in California, too. What our testing shows is that while nearly all batches test below California's legislated maximum daily intake threshold for reproductive toxicity, others may test slightly above the threshold that requires warning labels by the State of California. Important: The California (Prop 65) threshold for requiring warning labels is 1000x higher than the lowest observable effect of lead. 

Significance of Trace Amounts

To make the point again:  California's 1986 Proposition 65 threshold is at least 1,000 times lower than what a person would have to consume to cause an observable effect. To quote the law precisely, the threshold level for warning labels is "the level at which chemicals listed for reproductive toxicity would have no observable effect assuming exposure at 1,000 times that level."

California set the limits for disclosing the presence of lead in micrograms, (millionths of a gram), and we test to parts per billion (ppb), or 1,000 million. Warning labels about the presence of lead referring to reproductive toxicity is set at .5 micrograms per day by California which is approximately 35 ppb, or 35 parts per every 1,000,000,000.

Details

Our testing shows that the Balsamic Vinegar we sell is below the California threshold most of the time, in the 16 ppb to 30 ppb range, so Prop. 65 notices are not required, yet from time to time vinegar tests over the California threshold and must have a warning. I'm looking at a particular test on my desk from 2017 which shows one batch at 44 ppb and another at 55 ppb. I have a test from 2021 which is half that at 22 parts per billion (ppb). As we understand it, retailers who sell balsamic vinegar can display a single warning sign near where the product is sold and meet the proposition 65 labeling requirements, however, we suspect this doesn’t always get done leaving people to think they are buying “lead-free BV"; and If you live outside of California, there is no disclosure requirement as to heavy metal content at all. 

Some Math and Final Thoughts

What does the threshold of 35 ppb (parts per billion) mean when you're about to douse your salad with vinegar? Let's find out together by trying to size what 1 billion is as a unit of measure for vinegar. The FDA serving size for balsamic vinegar is 1 tablespoon.
  • 300 drops per tablespoon
  • 76,800 drops per gallon
  • 1,000,000,000 drops = 13,020.8 gallons
  • If a a producer delivered 13,020.8 gallons of vinegar to me, I would have use a Prop. 65 warning label if 35 of those 1,000,000,000 drops were lead.

[OPINION] I'm simplifying here, however, 13,020 gallons of balsamic vinegar is an impossible number for anyone to consume per day, or year, or even over their entire lifetime, so this seems to me to be a situation where good intentions yielded a confusing and unwanted outcome; a situation where the spirit of the law is obscured by the letter of the law. As a citizen I voted for Proposition 65 in my state's 1986 election because I wanted to know if there was any chance of exposure to toxic elements in my environment. Unfortunately, the law as it applies here does not seem aligned with real life and has served to create fear and doubt around an artisan product developed for health and pleasure. In the end, it is a good thing that we have this spotlight to consider for ourselves whether any exposure is worth it. In the end, it's up to you.

Should you discontinue using or reduce your use of red vinegars? That is a personal choice and one I respect. As a purveyor of the product I wanted you to know the care with which I determine sources, the ongoing quality testing that I do, and the extra consideration I give new information.

Let me know what you think in the comments or send me an email at Liz@AmericanOliveFarmer.com if you'd like more information.

 

Leave a comment